Some severe inspection is required for the scientific names and taxon ranks.
A quick scan using the GBIF nameparser reveals that almost 1800 scientific names could not be (partially) parsed, which gives an indication of nomenclatural issues. These include:
type
records
CANDIDATUS
1
CULTIVAR
16
DOUBTFUL
59
HYBRID
56
INFORMAL
40
SCIENTIFIC
1627
Especially the nomenclatural issues of the type = scientific should be inspected carefully.
I will publish the information now as it is integrated in the dataset.
Afterwards, we can take the time to inspect the data more in-dept.
Some severe inspection is required for the scientific names and taxon ranks. A quick scan using the GBIF nameparser reveals that almost 1800 scientific names could not be (partially) parsed, which gives an indication of nomenclatural issues. These include:
Especially the nomenclatural issues of the type = scientific should be inspected carefully.
I will publish the information now as it is integrated in the dataset. Afterwards, we can take the time to inspect the data more in-dept.