Closed LienReyserhove closed 5 years ago
See also this issue
After as short discussion with @DavidRoy, we decided to keep the mapping of the extinct species very simple, as it concerns only 21 records here. This is how these 21 records will be mapped:
population_status | abundance | occurrenceStatus |
---|---|---|
extinct | local | extinct |
extinct | rare | extinct |
extinct | single record | extinct |
The DwC field
occurrenceStatus
will be, in certain cases, a combination between the fieldsabundance
andpopulation_status
.In most cases , we can translate
abundance
to the GBIF controlled vocabulary ofoccurrenceStatus
. This is what I suggest (not al mapping is straightforward):However, for 30 taxa,
population_status
contains the fieldextinct
, which is valuable information foroccurrenceStatus
:I would suggest the following:
For the remaining abundance data (21 records in total) we could split the data (this is the same approach as in the manual of alien plants):
However, as it only concerns 21 records, I would keep it simple, and just map the abundance categories to extinct