Open timadriaens opened 5 years ago
Everything is as expected: the taxa in the source checklist are written as:
Crassula helmsii (Kirk) Cockayne Crassula helmsii (T. Kirk) Cock.
And considered synonyms of Crassula helmsii A.Berger. As a result they are listed in the verification spreadsheet, but were not verified. I have now done this.
Fixed in 0fe234d92acefc144c223ec93dd59cf8b23687f7
@peterdesmet @damianooldoni apparently not fixed yet as not yet in unified I downloaded on 19/06/2019
I find a taxon Crassula helmsii A.Berger
online:
https://www.gbif.org/species/156873457
It has been added as accepted taxon of two synonyms in verification file: line 166-167.
@timadriaens : Can you check it again?
Crassula helmsii (Kirk) Cockayne seems to be the correct name for this species. The backbone is wrong in this case Crassula helmsii A.Berger is a synonym of Crassula helmsii (Kirk) Cockayne, not the other way around. Actually, it should be Crassula helmsii (Kirk) A.Berger.
I can see that Crassula helmsii A.Berger is there now.
@LienReyserhove We need to add the alien bird checklist (even if it has little species) because some Union List species that occur in Belgium (e.g. Threskiornis aethiopicus, Acridotheres tristis) are lacking now. Also cannot find Humulus scandens (Humulus japonicus) on the unified whereas it was observed in 1954 but perhaps this was only very recently added to MAP?
I accidentally noticed Crassula helmsii does not occur on the unified. It is one of our most notorious invasive plant species. I see the accepted (that also occurs in the other GRIIS checklists) is this one, however, when mapping rinse and manual of alien plants is was mapped on the synonym .
@peterdesmet @damianooldoni can you check what went wrong here?