Carex pendula incorrectly on list, but not in manual

trias-project / unified-checklist

🇧🇪 Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species - Belgium

https://trias-project.github.io/unified-checklist/

MIT License

0 stars 1 forks source link

Carex pendula incorrectly on list, but not in manual #53

Open peterdesmet opened 4 years ago

peterdesmet commented 4 years ago

Originally reported in https://github.com/trias-project/alien-birds-checklist/issues/13 by @timadriaens:

Hi, scrolling through some emerging species products further down the pipeline and through the unified checklist itself, there are still a number of species that should not occur on the unified checklist. I use this issue to report them:

Carex pendula (Hangende zegge is a native species, the reference given in the unified is https://doi.org/10.15468/wtda1m which is the MAP, but this species in not on MAP)

peterdesmet commented 4 years ago

The issue is caused by Carex agastachys L.f. (which is on the MOAP) being considered a synonym of Carex pendula: https://gbif.org/species/2725229. This has been verified by @qgroom in the verification spreadsheet. If this association is incorrect, it should be corrected in the verification spreadsheet (e.g. by keeping Carex agastachys L.f. a separate taxon).

timadriaens commented 4 years ago

this should indeed be corrected

timadriaens commented 4 years ago

I have updated the verification.tsv (hope I did it right) and created a pull request @peterdesmet