search

trias-project / uredinales-belgium-checklist

🍃 Catalogue of the Rust Fungi of Belgium
https://trias-project.github.io/uredinales-belgium-checklist
MIT License
0 stars 1 forks source link

Should we keep static values in raw data? #4

Closed peterdesmet closed 6 years ago

peterdesmet commented 6 years ago

The following fields in the raw data file have the same value for all records. I would just add this static information once via the Rmd script and remove these from the raw data. @qgroom is that OK?

In addition, eventDate and to lesser extent taxonRank could probably generated ...

qgroom commented 6 years ago

Only bibliographicCitation varies. I have the page number in the file for every treatment which could be used with the bibliographicCitation to specify the exact location. It is not entirely necessary though.

LienReyserhove commented 6 years ago

@qgroom I now removed all DwC terms listed by @peterdesmet from the raw data file.

For bibliographicCitation, I kept part (volume number) and page in the raw file, and I removed the original column bibliograhicCitation (full reference). In the .Rmd file, I complement this information by linking part with the full reference based on this table:

part full_reference
1 Vanderweyen, A., & Fraiture, A. (2009). Catalogue des Uredinales de Belgique, 1re partie, Chaconiaceae, Coleosporiaceae, Cronartiaceae, Melampsoraceae, Phragmidiaceae, Pucciniastraceae, Raveneliaceae et Uropyxidaceae. Lejeunia, Revue de Botanique.
2 Vanderweyen, A., & Fraiture, A. (2009). Catalogue des Uredinales de Belgique, 2ème partie, Pucciniaceae (sauf Puccinia)(suite 2). Lejeunia, Revue de Botanique.
3 Vanderweyen, A., & Fraiture, A. (2012). Catalogue des Uredinales de Belgique, 3ème partie, Pucciniaceae (genre Puccinia). Lejeunia, Revue de Botanique.

So, in the raw file, only the volume and page number is given, while in the mapping, the full reference and page number is given.

Is that ok for you? If this sound a bit complex, I can explain you on Monday.

qgroom commented 6 years ago

That sounds fine Quentin

Dr. Quentin Groom (Botany and Information Technology)

Botanic Garden Meise Domein van Bouchout B-1860 Meise Belgium

ORCID: 0000-0002-0596-5376 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0596-5376

Landline; +32 (0) 226 009 20 ext. 364 FAX: +32 (0) 226 009 45

E-mail: quentin.groom@plantentuinmeise.be Skype name: qgroom Website: www.botanicgarden.be

On 4 January 2018 at 17:25, Lien Reyserhove notifications@github.com wrote:

@qgroom https://github.com/qgroom I now removed all DwC terms listed by @peterdesmet https://github.com/peterdesmet from the raw data file.

For bibliographicCitation, I kept part (volume number) and page in the raw file, and I removed the original column bibliograhicCitation (full reference). In the .Rmd file, I complement this information by linking part with the full reference based on this table: part full_reference 1 Vanderweyen, A., & Fraiture, A. (2009). Catalogue des Uredinales de Belgique, 1re partie, Chaconiaceae, Coleosporiaceae, Cronartiaceae, Melampsoraceae, Phragmidiaceae, Pucciniastraceae, Raveneliaceae et Uropyxidaceae. Lejeunia, Revue de Botanique. 2 Vanderweyen, A., & Fraiture, A. (2009). Catalogue des Uredinales de Belgique, 2ème partie, Pucciniaceae (sauf Puccinia)(suite 2). Lejeunia, Revue de Botanique. 3 Vanderweyen, A., & Fraiture, A. (2012). Catalogue des Uredinales de Belgique, 3ème partie, Pucciniaceae (genre Puccinia). Lejeunia, Revue de Botanique.

So, in the raw file, only the volume and page number is given, while in the mapping, the full reference and page number is given.

Is that ok for you? If this sound a bit complex, I can explain you on Monday.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/trias-project/uredinales-belgium/issues/4#issuecomment-355327654, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFRj0DOO3EZxwcTOH0raqx7oFbEc1Zm_ks5tHPtygaJpZM4RTFWQ .