Open pohm01 opened 3 years ago
In my opinion, it makes sense to print a warning. But maybe it's sufficient to print it once at the end of setup? How will this be affected by the verbosity level?
This issue has had no activity for 365 days and is marked for closure. It will be closed after an additional 30 days of inactivity.
If you would like to keep this issue open please add a comment and/or remove the MARKED_FOR_CLOSURE
label.
If this issue should be kept open even with no activity beyond the time limits you can add the label DO_NOT_AUTOCLOSE
.
If it is ok for this issue to be closed, feel free to go ahead and close it. Please do not add any comments or change any labels or otherwise touch this issue unless your intention is to reset the inactivity counter for an additional year.
This issue was closed due to inactivity for 395 days.
Still useful to address this. Reopening.
Bug Report
@trilinos/muelu
Description
When running a multilevel method with
coarse type: none
there is a warning message printed every iteration that you have "No coarse grid solver". Is this necessary? It is kind of annoying when you are running without a coarse gird on purpose.Related, why does
coarse type: none
not match something less elegant like a Jacobi relaxation with a damping parameter of 0.0 on the coarse grid?