Open debermudez opened 2 months ago
Before
After
Should we keep some precisions for both accuracy as well as aesthetic? (columns seem a bit too narrow 😅) I know @dyastremsky argued for integral number for nanosecond time, which I think made sense since fractional part of nanosecond is way too small to be significant. But for millisecond, I think we may want to keep the precision (up to 3 decimals?). What do you think @dyastremsky ?
Before
After
Should we keep some precisions for both accuracy as well as aesthetic? (columns seem a bit too narrow 😅) I know @dyastremsky argued for integral number for nanosecond time, which I think made sense since fractional part of nanosecond is way too small to be significant. But for millisecond, I think we may want to keep the precision (up to 3 decimals?). What do you think @dyastremsky ?
Those are good points! I would separate the accuracy concerns from the aesthetic ones. You should be able to make the columns artificially wider, though having them be narrow is better for small screens IMO. There is hopefully a setting in the library that can help with adding a buffer for larger screens.
As far as the accuracy concerns, I think changes in accuracy should be fully based on customer needs. I would confirm with a few users on what is useful for them.
The default scaling for timestamps is now ms from ns. Tests are updated. Console output is updated Plot labels are updated.