Typo3 12 compatibility?

[KaiBroenstrup]

Anyone got this working in Typo3 v12? Tried to migrate it but there is a problem with the image upload field. Something changed there again in Typo3 v12?

[helmut-winkelbach]

I also would need it for TYPO3 v 12. "repeatable_form_elements" has 16,448 downloads, should it should have a benefit.

[helsner]

we forked the extension, but should be usable either way https://github.com/toujou/repeatable_form_elements/pull/1/files I'm not finished with testing, but at least can say that the BE still works with it

the only actual changes are dependencies and objectmanager removal

[localhorst]

we forked the extension, but should be usable either way https://github.com/toujou/repeatable_form_elements/pull/1/files I'm not finished with testing, but at least can say that the BE still works with it

the only actual changes are dependencies and objectmanager removal

That's good news. Would you mind to create a pull request?

Edit: I see that you changed the namespace and extension name. So a merge into this repo would not be possible.

[klodeckl]

So there won‘t be a compatible version because the name changed?

[alpin3rocker]

Typo3 12 compatibility would be great. How can this be accelerated? Thanks for an answer...

[olforestman]

Atm, we are working on a series of new releases.

[chrosey]

As @olforestman said, we are currently working on TYPO3 v12 compatibility. The branch version/4.x.x should already be stable under TYPO3 v11 and v12

[klodeckl]

Sounds good, thank you!

[alpin3rocker]

version/4.x.x works! Install with Composer: composer.json

{ ... "require": { "tritum/repeatable-form-elements": "dev-version/4.x.x", }, "repositories": [ { "type": "vcs", "url": "https://github.com/tritum/repeatable_form_elements", "options": { "canonical": false } } ]

Thank's a lot!

[chrosey]

Will be solved in #42