Closed sloede closed 3 years ago
Merging #3 (7f473f3) into master (961f903) will decrease coverage by
0.00%
. The diff coverage is66.66%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 57.10% 57.09% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 65 65
Lines 9462 9465 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 5403 5404 +1
- Misses 4059 4061 +2
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 57.09% <66.66%> (-0.01%) |
:arrow_down: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
Source/HOHQMeshMain.f90 | 45.61% <50.00%> (-0.69%) |
:arrow_down: |
Source/Testing/MeshingTests.f90 | 93.58% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 961f903...7f473f3. Read the comment docs.
This the error output on Windows:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of failed tests for test suite: ControlFile: Benchmarks/ControlFiles/AllFeatures.control
11 failures out of 12 assertions.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Integer equality failed:
number of elements
Expected [1690], Got [1647]
Integer equality failed:
number of Nodes
Expected [1835], Got [1792]
Integer equality failed:
number of Edges
Expected [3525], Got [3439]
Integer equality failed:
number of bad elements
Expected [2], Got [3]
Double Precision equality failed:
signed area
Expected [0.30783800000000000], Got [0.31587506899605999]
Double Precision equality failed:
aspect ratio
Expected [1.2250500000000000], Got [1.2334162486319105]
Double Precision equality failed:
condition number
Expected [1.1475800000000000], Got [1.1524380540117851]
Double Precision equality failed:
edge ratio
Expected [1.4420200000000001], Got [1.4572046460075048]
Double Precision equality failed:
jacobian
Expected [0.23957600000000001], Got [0.24601121471317100]
Double Precision equality failed:
minimum angle
Expected [74.632999999999996], Got [74.148890457032337]
Double Precision equality failed:
maximum angle
Expected [107.65800000000000], Got [108.21491240771348]
@DavidAKopriva Any idea what might be causing this and why only on Windows?
The windows version is generating a different mesh than the other versions. Is it on the same version of fortran? I did have an issue once where between different versions different branches were followed, leading to different sections of code being executed. Interesting that it is the new control file. I'll see if I can reproduce it with my old machine.
The windows version is generating a different mesh than the other versions. Is it on the same version of fortran?
Yes, on Windows we get gfortran 10.3 (https://github.com/trixi-framework/HOHQMesh/runs/2765558496?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:7), while on Ubuntu we have 10.2 (https://github.com/trixi-framework/HOHQMesh/runs/2765558411?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:4) and on macOS 10.3 again (https://github.com/trixi-framework/HOHQMesh/runs/2765558446?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:4).
Then this will be hard to track down.
These changes are fine, the logic makes sense. The new optional argument doesn't need to be optional, i don't think. RunTests is a one-time only subroutine used in HOHQMesh only, so there are no, will there be no other calls to it.
OK, fixed in 7f473f3.
Let's continue the discussion about what might be broken in #4. I will merge this now such that at least we will see new tests failures for Ubuntu and macOS show up properly.
That is, if a test fails, now HOHQMesh fails with a non-zero exit code, making it easier to detect errors during CI testing.
Also amends
-version
flag to actually terminate.