Use @batch reduction functionality for subcell bounds check

[bennibolm]

Polyester.jl supports an automatic reduction functionality with @batch since the newest version v0.7.10. The bounds check of subcell limiting requires a reduction step of deviations, which created a lot of issue due to False Sharing in the past. After some testing and discussion, I implemented a relatively ugly fix in PR #1736. With the new Polyester functionality, we can achieve a much nicer solution with approximately the same performance and scaleability.

Test within branch bennibolm/subcell-limiting and fix in bennibolm/subcell-limiting-@batch-reduction

trixi_include("../examples/tree_2d_dgsem/elixir_euler_blast_wave_sc_subcell_nonperiodic.jl",
                       initial_refinement_level = 5)

Time results of the bounds check are

Roci:       old version                 new version wit @batch reduction
            time     %tot     avg       time     %tot     avg
1 Thread:   715ms    6.9%   457μs       707ms    6.8%   452μs
2 Threads:  348ms    4.7%   223μs       341ms    4.7%   218μs
4 Threads:  177ms    3.8%   113μs       173ms    3.9%   111μs
6 Threads:  121ms    3.3%  77.1μs       121ms    3.4%  77.4μs
8 Threads:  94.3ms   3.0%  60.3μs       93.0ms   2.9%  59.5μs
10 Threads: 77.4ms   2.6%  49.5μs       76.4ms   2.6%  48.9μs
12 Threads: 68.0ms   2.5%  43.5μs       66.7ms   2.4%  42.7μs
16 Threads: 55.1ms   2.2%  35.3μs       51.9ms   2.1%  33.2μs
24 Threads: 42.8ms   1.9%  27.4μs       38.3ms   1.7%  24.5μs

[github-actions[bot]]

Review checklist

This checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging.

Purpose and scope

• [ ] The PR has a single goal that is clear from the PR title and/or description.
• [ ] All code changes represent a single set of modifications that logically belong together.
• [ ] No more than 500 lines of code are changed or there is no obvious way to split the PR into multiple PRs.

Code quality

• [ ] The code can be understood easily.
• [ ] Newly introduced names for variables etc. are self-descriptive and consistent with existing naming conventions.
• [ ] There are no redundancies that can be removed by simple modularization/refactoring.
• [ ] There are no leftover debug statements or commented code sections.
• [ ] The code adheres to our conventions and style guide, and to the Julia guidelines.

Documentation

• [ ] New functions and types are documented with a docstring or top-level comment.
• [ ] Relevant publications are referenced in docstrings (see example for formatting).
• [ ] Inline comments are used to document longer or unusual code sections.
• [ ] Comments describe intent ("why?") and not just functionality ("what?").
• [ ] If the PR introduces a significant change or new feature, it is documented in NEWS.md.

Testing

• [ ] The PR passes all tests.
• [ ] New or modified lines of code are covered by tests.
• [ ] New or modified tests run in less then 10 seconds.

Performance

• [ ] There are no type instabilities or memory allocations in performance-critical parts.
• [ ] If the PR intent is to improve performance, before/after time measurements are posted in the PR.

Verification

• [ ] The correctness of the code was verified using appropriate tests.
• [ ] If new equations/methods are added, a convergence test has been run and the results are posted in the PR.

Created with :heart: by the Trixi.jl community.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.75000% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.31%. Comparing base (01032aa) to head (51ad911).

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/callbacks_stage/subcell_bounds_check_2d.jl	92.86%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1888 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 96.31% 96.31% -0.00% ========================================== Files 440 440 Lines 35797 35788 -9 ========================================== - Hits 34476 34467 -9 Misses 1321 1321 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/trixi-framework/Trixi.jl/pull/1888/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=trixi-framework) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/trixi-framework/Trixi.jl/pull/1888/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=trixi-framework) | `96.31% <93.75%> (-<0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=trixi-framework#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.