Bump StartUpDG.jl compat to 1.1.0

[jlchan]

Currently, StartUpDG.jl <1.1.0 imports NamedArrayPartition from RecursiveArrayTools.jl. Due to compat bounds put in place because of #1789, this prevents us from using newer versions of StartUpDG.jl.

This PR moves NamedArrayPartition back into StartUpDG.jl and lowers the compat requirement on RecursiveArrayTools.jl, hopefully making it compatible with Trixi.jl again.

[github-actions[bot]]

Review checklist

This checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging.

Purpose and scope

• [ ] The PR has a single goal that is clear from the PR title and/or description.
• [ ] All code changes represent a single set of modifications that logically belong together.
• [ ] No more than 500 lines of code are changed or there is no obvious way to split the PR into multiple PRs.

Code quality

• [ ] The code can be understood easily.
• [ ] Newly introduced names for variables etc. are self-descriptive and consistent with existing naming conventions.
• [ ] There are no redundancies that can be removed by simple modularization/refactoring.
• [ ] There are no leftover debug statements or commented code sections.
• [ ] The code adheres to our conventions and style guide, and to the Julia guidelines.

Documentation

• [ ] New functions and types are documented with a docstring or top-level comment.
• [ ] Relevant publications are referenced in docstrings (see example for formatting).
• [ ] Inline comments are used to document longer or unusual code sections.
• [ ] Comments describe intent ("why?") and not just functionality ("what?").
• [ ] If the PR introduces a significant change or new feature, it is documented in NEWS.md with its PR number.

Testing

• [ ] The PR passes all tests.
• [ ] New or modified lines of code are covered by tests.
• [ ] New or modified tests run in less then 10 seconds.

Performance

• [ ] There are no type instabilities or memory allocations in performance-critical parts.
• [ ] If the PR intent is to improve performance, before/after time measurements are posted in the PR.

Verification

• [ ] The correctness of the code was verified using appropriate tests.
• [ ] If new equations/methods are added, a convergence test has been run and the results are posted in the PR.

Created with :heart: by the Trixi.jl community.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 83.00%. Comparing base (a160481) to head (7233b57).

:exclamation: There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (a160481) and HEAD (7233b57). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

| Flag | BASE (a160481) | HEAD (7233b57) | |------|------|------| |unittests|25|24|

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #2001 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 96.19% 83.00% -13.19% =========================================== Files 462 462 Lines 37027 36979 -48 =========================================== - Hits 35615 30693 -4922 - Misses 1412 6286 +4874 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/trixi-framework/Trixi.jl/pull/2001/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=trixi-framework) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/trixi-framework/Trixi.jl/pull/2001/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=trixi-framework) | `83.00% <ø> (-13.19%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=trixi-framework#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ranocha]

Thanks!

Looks like the CI failure is real:

https://github.com/trixi-framework/Trixi.jl/actions/runs/9780885936/job/27003604009?pr=2001#step:7:1317

  LoadError: "Memory access for Kronecker.KroneckerProduct{Float64, Matrix{Float64}, Matrix{Float64}} not implemented yet."

[jlchan]

Thanks! I should be able to get to this after the holiday (July 4 in the US)