codecov[bot]
commented
10 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
6679af4) 97.98% compared to head (9202e29) 80.27%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #167 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 97.98% 80.27% -17.71% =========================================== Files 13 19 +6 Lines 547 715 +168 Branches 0 50 +50 =========================================== + Hits 536 574 +38 - Misses 11 137 +126 - Partials 0 4 +4 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/trixi-framework/libtrixi/pull/167/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=trixi-framework) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/trixi-framework/libtrixi/pull/167/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=trixi-framework) | `80.27% <ø> (-17.71%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=trixi-framework#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Got the token from https://app.codecov.io/gh/trixi-framework/libtrixi/settings and followed https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action?tab=readme-ov-file#usage