Closed marknl closed 8 years ago
@marknl Awesome thanks. Could you please update the spec tests to include this as well.
Fixed.
Thanks for adding the tests. I'm going to spin up a cloudlinux instance and check it out, and then probably accept.
Also for the future @marknl, please make slightly more descriptive commit messages. Three messages with the same exact subject line don't provide a lot of detail and erode the value of having a commit history.
Will do!
@marknl I spun up a cloud linux 7.0 instance and it's nsswitch looks by default like the centos one with the addition of sss
for about five of the services.
Which versions of cloud linux did you test against?
Just loaded up a cloud Linux 6.6 instance too, and it's nsswitch looks exactly like the Centos/Rhel section. I think I need to check back and differentiate between EL 6 and EL 7.
So yeah, just checked. Cloudlinux appears to actually follow the Enterprise Linux patterns. What I do need to do however is update to account for EL 6 vs 7.
If I'm missing something critical @marknl please let me know.
Hmm, strange .. Maybe my co-worker(s) changed the layout of the nsswitch.conf file. I'll double check it at work tomorrow and let you know.
edit: we're running CL6
@marknl I'm going to close this for now and add CloudLinux as one of the EL platforms since all my testing from fresh ISO installs indicates that it aligns with the Standard EL form.
If you find anything else, please let me know.
Hi, sorry for the delay. swamped at work. I just checked a fresh CL6 server, and it indeed seems like i was incorrect at first. The nsswitch indeed aligns with the Standard EL form.
nsswitch.conf looks (by default) the most on the ones that are supplied by Debian/Ubuntu, therefor I placed it there (Though CL is actually a CentOS based distro).