my code doesn't work :(

[trm109]

What happened: idk What you expected to happen: something How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible): I can't Anything else we need to know?: Help Environment:

• AWS Region:
• Instance Type(s):
• EKS Platform version (use aws eks describe-cluster --name <name> --query cluster.platformVersion):
• Kubernetes version (use aws eks describe-cluster --name <name> --query cluster.version):
• AMI Version:
• Kernel (e.g. uname -a):
• Release information (run cat /etc/eks/release on a node):

[trm109]

I like trains

[trm109]

/summarize

[github-actions[bot]]

[trm109]

someone fix this bug

[trm109]

/summarize

[github-actions[bot]]

Summary: The GitHub issue is a bug report with a template that has not been filled out properly. The user, trm109, has provided minimal information, stating "idk" and "something" in the "What happened" and "What you expected to happen" sections, respectively. They also mentioned that they cannot reproduce the issue and asked for help. The issue lacks essential details, making it difficult to understand and resolve the problem. The conversation is unproductive, with the user making unrelated comments about liking trains and asking someone to fix the bug without providing any useful information. The conclusion is that the issue is incomplete and unclear, requiring more information and context to be addressed effectively.

[trm109]

/summarize

[github-actions[bot]]

Based on the provided comment log, I can summarize the GitHub issue as follows:

Issue Summary: The issue was created by user trm109, but it appears to be a non-serious or potentially spam issue. The initial issue description uses a template for reporting bugs, but the user filled it with nonsensical or incomplete information.

Details:

1. The user didn't provide any specific problem description.
2. No actual bug or expected behavior was described.
3. The environment details were left blank.

Follow-up Comments: The same user (trm109) added two more comments:

1. "I like trains"
2. "someone fix this bug"

Conclusion: There is no real issue or bug presented here. The issue appears to be either a misuse of the bug reporting system or potentially spam. No meaningful discussion or problem-solving occurred in this issue thread. It's likely that this issue would be closed without any action taken, as it doesn't contain any actionable information or genuine bug report.

[trm109]

/summarize awslabs amazon-eks-ami 1002

[github-actions[bot]]

Here's a summary of the GitHub issue reply chain:

Issue: Request for a pre-built FIPS version of the Amazon Linux 2 (AL2) EKS AMI provided by Amazon.

Key points:

1. The issue creator, stevehipwell, requests FIPS-enabled EKS AMIs for both AMD64 and ARM64 architectures.
2. Several users support this request, citing the need for FIPS compliance in various scenarios and the current toil involved in creating custom FIPS-enabled images.
3. Some users mention having to create their own infrastructure to build FIPS-enabled images, which is time-consuming and complex.
4. The issue is related to FedRAMP High compliance, which requires FIPS.
5. There's discussion about Bottlerocket OS as an alternative, but it's noted that it's not a complete replacement for this request.
6. Users express interest in FIPS support for both AL2 and the newer AL2023.

Conclusion: As of the last comment, there is no official response from AWS maintainers regarding the implementation of pre-built FIPS-enabled EKS AMIs. The issue remains open, with users still expressing interest in this feature. While Bottlerocket OS is suggested as an alternative for FIPS support, it's acknowledged that it doesn't fully address the original request for AL2/AL2023 FIPS-enabled EKS AMIs.

[trm109]

/summarize hashicorp packer 12917

[github-actions[bot]]

Here's a summary of the GitHub issue discussion:

Issue:

• When using the SSH communicator to provision a FIPS-enabled target, Packer hangs and eventually times out.
• Error messages in the target system logs indicate that the key exchange type c25519 is not allowed in FIPS mode.

Investigation:

• The Hashicorp team member (lbajolet-hashicorp) was unable to reproduce the issue in multiple test scenarios:

  1. Using a local FIPS-enabled CentOS 9 Stream VM
  2. Using the spel templates for AWS
  3. Testing with both Packer 1.8.7 and the latest version

• The tests showed that Packer was able to negotiate an SSH algorithm and connect successfully in all cases.

Clarifications:

• It was confirmed that the issue reporter (ferricoxide) was using FIPS-enabled images.
• The spel templates were initially using a non-FIPS "bootstrap" builder.

Conclusion:

• The Hashicorp team was unable to reproduce the issue despite multiple attempts and configurations.
• The issue reporters (ferricoxide and lorengordon) will need to revalidate the problem and provide a better reproduction case if they are still able to reproduce it.
• The issue remains unresolved, pending further information or confirmation from the reporters.

Next steps:

• The issue reporters will attempt to reproduce the problem again and provide more detailed steps if successful.
• If the problem cannot be reproduced, it may have resolved itself.

[trm109]

/summarize 2

[github-actions[bot]]

I apologize, but based on the comment log provided, there doesn't seem to be a clear or substantive issue being discussed. The log contains:

1. An empty template for submitting feature requests.
2. Two brief comments from the same user (trm109) that don't provide any meaningful information about an actual issue or feature request.

Without more context or detailed comments, it's not possible to determine what specific issue or feature is being addressed, nor is there any conclusion to summarize. The comments appear to be placeholder text or test comments rather than a genuine discussion of a GitHub issue.

If this is meant to represent an actual issue discussion, more detailed information would be needed to provide a meaningful summary.