trogdoro / xiki

A shell console with GUI features
http://xiki.org
Other
3.76k stars 208 forks source link

Add gitignore file #40

Closed jc00ke closed 11 years ago

jc00ke commented 11 years ago

Should ignore a bunch of files, especially Gemfile.lock

keithtom commented 11 years ago

generally like the .gitignore file but if we ignore Gemfile.lock, then how do we deal w/ the problem of new users might bundle unstable gem versions? if we commited a gemfile.lock, we'd at least be guaranteed to have a stable set of dependencies. thoughts?

trogdoro commented 11 years ago

Interesting post about whether to check in Gemfile.lock:

http://yehudakatz.com/2010/12/16/clarifying-the-roles-of-the-gemspec-and-gemfile/

--Craig

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Keith Tom notifications@github.comwrote:

generally like the .gitignore file but if we ignore Gemfile.lock, then how do we deal w/ the problem of new users might bundle unstable gem versions? if we commited a gemfile.lock, we'd at least be guaranteed to have a stable set of dependencies. thoughts?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/trogdoro/xiki/pull/40#issuecomment-10478134.

keithtom commented 11 years ago

ah cool, good to know, thanks!

On Nov 17, 2012, at 6:21 PM, trogdoro notifications@github.com wrote:

Interesting post about whether to check in Gemfile.lock:

http://yehudakatz.com/2010/12/16/clarifying-the-roles-of-the-gemspec-and-gemfile/

--Craig

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Keith Tom notifications@github.comwrote:

generally like the .gitignore file but if we ignore Gemfile.lock, then how do we deal w/ the problem of new users might bundle unstable gem versions? if we commited a gemfile.lock, we'd at least be guaranteed to have a stable set of dependencies. thoughts?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/trogdoro/xiki/pull/40#issuecomment-10478134.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

mkb commented 11 years ago

:thumbsup: