My #4 issue is pretty old, and this is about the only thing I saw as I dug through forecasts- it is possible to have a name type without an authority, and in many cases it can be too much. Otherwise, I think we look good.
I also removed the recommendation for URIs in the IDs. I don't think it's appropriate here. First of all, I'm not sure I agree with it, but even before we get there I think we've crossing our opinions into modeling, which we've agreed is a slippery slope into a larger project.
Contributes to #82 Closes #4
My #4 issue is pretty old, and this is about the only thing I saw as I dug through forecasts- it is possible to have a name type without an authority, and in many cases it can be too much. Otherwise, I think we look good.
I also removed the recommendation for URIs in the IDs. I don't think it's appropriate here. First of all, I'm not sure I agree with it, but even before we get there I think we've crossing our opinions into modeling, which we've agreed is a slippery slope into a larger project.