Open julien51 opened 6 years ago
Hi Julien,
yes, we have the same problem. We used the code you provided in a pullreq and works ok. I hope it is merged or considered ASAP.
Thank you!
Can we reference the PR here?
It seems to me that such a change would make sense since naming-conflicts are not a problem with contract addresses.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been closed, but can be re-opened if further comments indicate that the problem persists. Feel free to tag maintainers if there is no reply to further comments.
For 2.0 consideration
Right now, Drizzle uses the contract names to identify them.... but I think it would be better to index them by address than by name because a given app could have multiple contracts with the same name.