Open tcoulter opened 4 years ago
Unfortunately this appears to be a known issue with the current implementation of Tezos.
See ecadlabs/taquito#213, https://gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues/644, & https://gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues/36.
The issue 644 is at least fixed now
Hello @haltman-at & @fainashalts can you please make a statement as to why Tezos support is not a priority anymore? To be honest it leaves a bad taste after the big announcement od Tezos support in Truffle (Twitter and Blogpost) over two years ago. The funny thing is the support didnt last long, less than a year later Truffle started to ghost all issues and update requests on github or stated to do it later.. why the sudden change back then?
At least make either make it official and announce that you are not supporting Tezos anymore or at least update Tezos Truffle to current protocol standard. I dont know maybe its a failure on the communication side, maybe Truffle @tcoulter and Tezos Foundation @drchrispinnock need to talk but the current state is unfortunate.
In the
alphaTez
branch, in a console, I pressed Ctrl+C while a call to a contract function was executing. I forgot to addawait
, so I "quit it" to send the request again.On the second request, I got an error from the blockchain node suggesting it expected
962
, but got961
. I tried the request again, and it failed in the same way. Eventually the transaction succeeded. This suggests a nonce-like state issue recorded intruffle-contract
somewhere, much like we had in the past with Ethereum, that eventually fixes itself due to what I'd guess is some state check finally succeeding (totally guessing here). Is this helpful?Steps to reproduce:
instance.main(3)
, preferably against a really slow testnet.