Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
uploaded to rietveld
http://codereview.appspot.com/4524077/
Original comment by travis.p...@gmail.com
on 28 May 2011 at 12:11
Original comment by joe.gregorio@gmail.com
on 13 Jun 2011 at 4:58
what's the justification for wontfix?
http:// with no explicit port implies port 80 and https:// implies 443, but 443
doesn't imply encryption without the https://.
it'd be pretty foolish to serve unencrypted http on port 443, but that's no
reason for httplib2 to be unable to make requests there. the code is just wrong
as is.
Original comment by travis.p...@gmail.com
on 13 Jun 2011 at 7:08
travis has it right.
even if it's pretty foolish.. there are some http server on 443 ports (for
example the non-sensitive trading data stream of my online bank!!) so the patch
should be accepted.
Original comment by lorenzo....@gmail.com
on 6 Jul 2011 at 6:05
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
travis.p...@gmail.com
on 27 May 2011 at 10:17Attachments: