Closed jcrossley3 closed 1 month ago
Fixing this will require the "divination" of affected packages from myriad advisory sources and formats. I assumed the logic was fairly complete but I was wrong especially about CVE records. See #763
We're also not seeing any affected items in the sboms
field -- always seems to be empty.
With #825 merged, I think we can close this now. It's too vague, anyway. Future issues should reference specific advisory source docs.
This may have worked in the past, but it seems the
purls
field is always blank for theadvisories
returned from/api/v1/vulnerability/{id}
.According to @bobmcwhirter