Closed italobusi closed 1 year ago
Discussed during IETF 114 TEAS WG session:
Tarek Saad: question on the union. Do we rely on parsing the value to know if it is dotted-quad or URI? It could be error prone. Italo Busi: good question, to be disucssed during the progress of the document.
See: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-114-teas-202207251000/
2023-02-24 TE Call
Xufeng: the union might not work because the URI can be anything, including a dotted-quad
Better to have two separated fields (as in the TE topology model):
OLD
| +--rw source? te-types:te-node-id
| +--rw destination? te-types:te-node-id
NEW
| +--rw source? te-types:te-node-id
| +--rw destination? te-types:te-node-id
| +--rw source-node-id? <<uri>>
| +--rw destination-node-id? <<uri>>
No need to change te-types
2023-03-10 TE Call
NEW
| +--rw source
| | +--rw te-node-id? te-types:te-node-id
| | +--rw node-id? <<uri>>
| | +--rw tunnel-tp-id? binary
| +--rw destination
| | +--rw te-node-id? te-types:te-node-id
| | +--rw node-id? <<uri>>
| | +--rw tunnel-tp-id? binary
The 'te-node-id' is enough to locate the node in the topology. However, the TE topology has both (node-id is key).
2023-05-26 TE Call
Different identifiers for networks, nodes, links and termination points in network topology and TE topology models
For example:
Proposal: update the TE types to be an union with URI; for example: te-node-id is an union between dotted-quad and URI
See: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/SdQbL_yOavuqQxSJqOvJK_d7qTg/