Closed italobusi closed 8 months ago
@italobusi : we have a similar problem in RFC9093-bis https://github.com/ietf-ccamp-wg/ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-ext-RFC9093-bis/issues/64. For my understanding to mode an RFC containing requirements from normative to informative reference solves both the issues. Right?
Maybe we can remove this reference completely: depending on the resolution of #245
Reference removed while addressing #245
This issue can be closed together with #245 when PR #247 is merged
Investigate whether it is possible to move the reference to RFC2702 to Informative instead of Normative