Closed eldonb closed 3 years ago
All done @eldonb, thanks very much for such a thorough reading!
As a side note, the \one macro clearly shows you're not a computer scientist - the Iversonian brackets notation is so much nicer :wink:
Regarding the second Martin et al reference (line 1012 reference above), this is an erratum, and I agree it looks weird. This seems to be the actual reference though, so I didn't want to start chopping it up.
the line numbers refer to the latest pdf version
comments 0: line 610: `nuetral'
comment 1: regarding Instantaneous bottlenecks:
the paper referenced below derive a Xi-coalescent, a simultaneous multiple-merger coalescent, for a Wright-Fisher population undergoing strong instantaneous bottlenecks (see Prop 6.3); so it could be referenced along with the other papers on this, but I don"t think their actual Xi-coalescent has been implemented
@article{BBMST09, author = {M Birkner and J Blath and M M\"{o}hle and M Steinr\"{u}cken and J Tams}, journal = {ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat.}, pages = {25--61}, title = {A modified lookdown construction for the {X}i-{F}leming-{V}iot process with mutation and populations with recurrent bottlenecks}, volume = 6, year = 2009 }
comment 2: In Eq (2) for the Lambda-coal rate, we should explain the `\one' symbol (for the case k=2) :
line 1285: "where \one{A} := 1 if A holds, and zero otherwise"
and some minor typos in the references, mainly just raising some letters to the capital state:
in References line 762: `{DNA} variation in the high-fecundity {Atlantic} cod: '
the rreference on line 1012 looks a bit strange
reference line 1021: {SARS-COV-2}
reference line 1031: {X}
reference line 1051: {R}
reference line 1054: {Hudsons}
reference line 1104: {II}
reference page 1161: {Kingman's}