Closed jeromekelleher closed 2 years ago
Although I see refsize= 1e6, so that makes things less comparable with the rest of the paper as well (Ne=10^4, r=1e-8). Is there any particular reason for these parameter values @andrewkern? What do you suggest doing here?
Also, if we're redoing this figure could we do it in such a way that we report the time for one replicate rather than 100? See Reviewer 1:
And based on the descriptions sometimes replicates are summed over (Figure 7) or averaged over (Figure 8?) to determine the values on the y-axis.
We can explain that it's tricky finding parameter combos where discoal will run in a reasonable amount of time, but it must be possible if we squeeze the sequence length space enough?
sure, i can make these changes. no problem.
@jeromekelleher is there a more up to date Makefile
that didn't get committed here?
Makefile should be fully up to date, but I'm not sure if it contained all the linkage for making the data (I probably didn't bother with some of that and just ran then scripts).
👍
It's probably simplest to just rerun this with recombination rate = 10^-8 and a sequence length 10x shorter I think? @andrewkern?