Closed benjeffery closed 3 years ago
How about https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ?
@jeromekelleher Updated to CC-BY-4.0
Any objections to CC-BY-4 for the website @tskit-dev/all ?
CC-BY-4 is good and you should use it. But I would like to grumble that the license text is too complicated and no one can read it---if the plain language summaries of the license aren't good enough for the law, then as a society we need better laws.
CC-BY-4 perfect with me.
But I would like to grumble that the license text is too complicated and no one can read it---if the plain language summaries of the license aren't good enough for the law, then as a society we need better laws.
I think this is probably a separate issue :wink:
works for me
Sounds good to me.
Seems we have agreement - will merge.
We should probably have a discussion around this - I'm fine with MIT, but maybe a CC of some sort would be more appropriate for website content?