The paragraph starting with "The word “ARG” is now widely used to refer..." is too vague at the moment and needs to be made more concrete. Comment from Gideon and Alex:
These problems make sense, but I am wondering if you can flesh out or demonstrate some of these issues a little? For instance, do you have citations or perhaps real and/or hypothetical examples of how this terminological ambiguity causes issues when evaluating inferred ARGs or defining success? A little bit of an elaboration on these ideas could more compellingly articulate the importance and urgency of the paper.
The paragraph starting with "The word “ARG” is now widely used to refer..." is too vague at the moment and needs to be made more concrete. Comment from Gideon and Alex: