Closed shihikoo closed 3 years ago
Hello,
It looks like you got two questions here:
Let's solve #1 first. Are you running the example with par = [2,-87,2,-5,0,0, tilt, x,y,z], where the tilt is in radian?
Thanks, Sheng
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 11:45, Jing @.***> wrote:
Hi
I'm testing this python geopack package with the IDL routine.
I first tested with the parameters used in the test_geopack1.md as following: Time/dipole tilt: 2001-01-01/02:03:04 UT/ps = -0.533585131 rad Position: (xgsm,ygsm,zgsm) = (-5.1,0.3,2.8) Model parameter: T89: iopt = 2 T96, T01, and T04: par = [2., -87., 2., -5., 0., 0., ps, xgsm,ygsm,zgsm].
t89 | idl | 20.772 | -0.647 | -15.072 | python | 20.772 | -0.647 | -15.072 t96 | idl | 61.179 | -1.461 | -40.451 | python | 61.179 | -1.461 | -40.451 t01 | idl | 46.973 | 1.544 | -31.355 | python | 46.354 | 1.440 | -32.000 t04 | idl | -8.080 | -1.512 | -0.722 | python | 12.010 | -2.635 | -11.964
This result is similar to what is in test_geopack1.md except t04 for IDL routine.
I then tested for one of the MMS data, and the results are much different datetime | 2016-01-01/12:13:20 iopt / kp | 3 / 2 (xgsm,ygsm,zgsm) = | 6.96, 0.49, -0.66 parmod | 0.976, -50.20, 6.59, -5.512, 0., 0., tilt, x,y,z
t89 | idl | -3.657066785 | 1.085712758 | 13.86057416 | python | -2.37842015 | 1.038191716 | 14.38198039
t96 | idl | 22.97810632 | -1.106448782 | -4.147864164 | python | 50.00624944 | 6.397909797 | -147.0215389
t01 | idl | 5.001211425 | 0.02607965332 | 3.264103442 | python | 6.230733691 | 4.283414418 | -2.58591528
t04 | idl | -15.25291193 | -8.650237035 | -10.97633666 | python | 7.905332371 | -1.161844446 | -7.933264503
Could you help me with it?
Thanks
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/tsssss/geopack/issues/7, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADBMLBRBDN2CXTWVIPOBVYTTUSQDHANCNFSM47KDZOEQ .
Hello,
I'll close this issue because I've tested that if tilt in radian is used, the IDL results for t04 are the same as those in the example. For Bx,y,z, I got 12.009596 -2.6345863 -11.964033
Please feel free to test your MMS example and contact me if there's still inconsistency.
Thanks, Sheng
Hi
I'm testing this python geopack package with the IDL routine.
I first tested with the parameters used in the test_geopack1.md as following: Time/dipole tilt: 2001-01-01/02:03:04 UT/ps = -0.533585131 rad Position: (xgsm,ygsm,zgsm) = (-5.1,0.3,2.8) Model parameter: T89: iopt = 2 T96, T01, and T04: par = [2., -87., 2., -5., 0., 0., ps, xgsm,ygsm,zgsm].
t89 | idl | 20.772 | -0.647 | -15.072 | python | 20.772 | -0.647 | -15.072 t96 | idl | 61.179 | -1.461 | -40.451 | python | 61.179 | -1.461 | -40.451 t01 | idl | 46.973 | 1.544 | -31.355 | python | 46.354 | 1.440 | -32.000 t04 | idl | -8.080 | -1.512 | -0.722 | python | 12.010 | -2.635 | -11.964
This result is similar to what is in test_geopack1.md except t04 for IDL routine.
I then tested for one of the MMS data, and the results are much different datetime | 2016-01-01/12:13:20 iopt / kp | 3 / 2 (xgsm,ygsm,zgsm) = | 6.96, 0.49, -0.66 parmod | 0.976, -50.20, 6.59, -5.512, 0., 0., tilt, x,y,z
t89 | idl | -3.657066785 | 1.085712758 | 13.86057416 | python | -2.37842015 | 1.038191716 | 14.38198039
t96 | idl | 22.97810632 | -1.106448782 | -4.147864164 | python | 50.00624944 | 6.397909797 | -147.0215389
t01 | idl | 5.001211425 | 0.02607965332 | 3.264103442 | python | 6.230733691 | 4.283414418 | -2.58591528
t04 | idl | -15.25291193 | -8.650237035 | -10.97633666 | python | 7.905332371 | -1.161844446 | -7.933264503
Could you help me with it?
Thanks