Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
No. FLAC's framesize (usually 4,096 samples) is different from the CD's (588
samples), so no sample-accurate splitting is possible without re-encoding.
Splitting with re-encoding has no penalty in terms of the quality.
Original comment by tmkkmac
on 7 Apr 2013 at 3:51
Thanks for the response but not sure I follow - When you use a tool such as
Medieval Cue Splitter on the Windows platform, all it does, is chop the file
into the track pieces according to the CUE file information. I don't believe
any re-ecncoding happens and the files I end up with are perfect and correct
with their sample rates of in the 800+ or so for standard redbook files. So I
am not so sure that re-encoding is really is required and there are other tools
out there that don't deem it necessary it would seem...
Original comment by ebaldacc...@gmail.com
on 7 Apr 2013 at 5:13
I mean sample-accurate splitting.
It may be possible with partial (i.e. only end/beginning of the track)
re-encoding. But anyway XLD isn't designed for processing files without
encoding/decoding.
Original comment by tmkkmac
on 7 Apr 2013 at 5:38
OK - Thanks. I guess I'll stick with the Windows based tool for splitting
single FLAC files as I know the file doesn't get re-encoded which is what I am
trying to avoid.
Original comment by ebaldacc...@gmail.com
on 7 Apr 2013 at 9:05
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ebaldacc...@gmail.com
on 7 Apr 2013 at 3:45