search

tsvwg / draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options

0 stars 0 forks source link

Clarification Request for non-terminal fragments #1

Closed gorryfair closed 9 months ago

gorryfair commented 1 year ago

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 9:28 AM Erik Auerswald wrote:

I do not understand how both "[n]on-terminal fragments never have options after the fragment" and "The RDOS field enables the FRAG option to precede other options in every fragment" can be true at the same time.

gorryfair commented 1 year ago

Seems related to: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/D99trU_nsq4rRGT24gNeeDnkfoE/

Mike-Heard commented 11 months ago

Specific text to fix the issues with Section 9.4 was suggested in:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/0RptobbqczCVoOy-B8L_CJaj25w/

jtouch commented 9 months ago

Text incorporated in -23 already. Please advise if this resolves this issue.

gorryfair commented 9 months ago

Discussed at Interim and closed.