tsvwg / draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options

0 stars 0 forks source link

Suggestion for reduced RDOS text #2

Closed gorryfair closed 9 months ago

gorryfair commented 1 year ago

I think if the following text is removed from Section 9.4, the rest of the section will make sense. --cut here-- If RDOS is larger than Frag. Start of the first fragment (offset=8), then all the per-packet options occur before the user data as it is reassembled. If RDOS points to the end of the original IP packet, then there are no per-packet options. If RDOS is smaller than Frag. Start of the first fragment, then it indicates the end of the per- fragment options (of the first fragment) and the start of per-packet options (of the reassembled user data). The RDOS field enables the FRAG option to precede other options in every fragment and to enable all packet options to precede user data, enabling easier support for reassembly offload via DMA and to support limited router option processing hardware. --end--

Mike-Heard commented 12 months ago

The above was one of two paragraphs that I propose to eliminate. This was the second:

--cut here-- Note: per packet options can occur either at the end of the original user data or be placed after the FRAG option of the first segment, with the Reassembled Datagram Option Start (RDOS) in the terminal FRAG option set accordingly. This includes its use in atomic fragments, where the terminal option is the initial and only fragment. --end--

Mike-Heard commented 12 months ago

Like Issue #1, this is also related to

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/D99trU_nsq4rRGT24gNeeDnkfoE/

Mike-Heard commented 11 months ago

Specific text to fix the issues with Section 9.4 was suggested in:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/0RptobbqczCVoOy-B8L_CJaj25w/

jtouch commented 9 months ago

Text incorporated; these paragraphs deleted (I think) in -23. Please let me know if further consideration is needed.

gorryfair commented 9 months ago

Discussed at Interim and closed.