search

tsvwg / draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options

0 stars 0 forks source link

Med: WGLC Minor NiTs #33

Open gorryfair opened 2 months ago

gorryfair commented 2 months ago

(1) I don't remember that I have seen "Diff Svcs" in a RFC +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |Version| IHL | Diff Svcs | Total Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

(2) Not all options have a "length"

The remainder of the surplus area consists of options defined using a TLV (type, length, and optional value)

(Added by GF during WGLC)

gorryfair commented 2 months ago

I expect DS field or DSCP ought to be used in place of "Diff Svcs"