search

tsvwg / draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options

1 stars 1 forks source link

IANA request for clarification #68

Closed jtouch closed 3 weeks ago

jtouch commented 3 weeks ago

IANA review indicated the following:

Dear Authors,

Before the IETF meeting, we check working group agendas for documents with IANA-related issues. We have notes about this document:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-37

Would you want to tell us to include a pointer to the combined TCP/UDP ExIDs registry in the new UDP Options group? It could be useful to note that the registry will continue to be available in the “Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Parameters” group (if that's true), but that a pointer can be found in the new “UDP Options” group. Alternatively, should the document tell us to create a separate group for it and leave a pointer behind in tcp-parameters?

If you have any questions, just let us know. If you'd like to talk in person, you can find us next to the RFC Editor's table from Monday through Thursday. You can also request another review at any time by contacting us at iana@iana.org.

For more information about IANA Considerations section requirements, please see

https://www.iana.org/help/protocol-registration

Best regards,

Amanda Baber IANA Operations Manager

jtouch commented 3 weeks ago

Yes, we’ll add instructions in the next update to home the combined registry where it currently is, rename it to TCP/UDP ExIDs, and have a link under UDP to the same list.

Thanks both for the request and the suggested resolution.

Joe —

Updated clarification in rev -38 just posted.