search

tsvwg / ietf-multipath-dccp

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp/
8 stars 13 forks source link

Clarified why DCCP-Ack may not carry an MP suboption #320

Open markusa opened 1 month ago

markusa commented 1 month ago

Addresses ART review comment:

Section 3.2.6: The text says:

   ...  In the event that an
   MP_HMAC cannot be associated with a suboption, unless it is an
   MP_HMAC sent in DCCP-Ack in response to a DCCP-Response packet
   containing an MP_JOIN option, this MP_HMAC MUST be ignored.

This text begs for an explanation of MP_HMAC sent in DCCP-Ack in
response to a DCCP-Response packet containing an MP_JOIN option.
If a sentence will not cover it, then please add a pointer to the
part of the document that discusses this situation.