Cannot compile 2009Q3 or trunk with --enable-shared

tthtlc / unladen-swallow

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow

Other

1 stars 0 forks source link

Cannot compile 2009Q3 or trunk with --enable-shared #104

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Hi,

I'm a linux user on X86_64 and I'm trying to compile unladen with the option 
--enable-shared to use it with mod_msgi and other application that need the 
shared lib.
I'm not sure but, I think that it was working the last time I tried. It was 
with Q2 I think.
See the attached file for the error.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by dory.thi...@gmail.com on 29 Dec 2009 at 8:56

Attachments:

unladen_compile

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Hum sorry, for the "Type-Enhancement". I was pretty sure I chose "Defect"...

Original comment by dory.thi...@gmail.com on 29 Dec 2009 at 8:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I believe I just committed the fix in r954. Can you update your trunk checkout 
and 
reconfigure/remake?

Original comment by collinw on 29 Dec 2009 at 10:17

Changed state: Accepted
Added labels: Type-Defect
Removed labels: Type-Enhancement

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Note that if you were hardcoding the necessary Python flags into your makefile, 
you 
need to use python-config instead.

Original comment by collinw on 30 Dec 2009 at 12:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

It works, thx!
I used ./configure --enable-shared

Original comment by dory.thi...@gmail.com on 30 Dec 2009 at 12:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Thanks for reporting this problem.

I've added a buildslave to test this configuration so we don't break it again. 
I'm also 
going to add something like mod_python to our test suite.

Original comment by collinw on 30 Dec 2009 at 7:05

Changed state: Fixed
Added labels: Release-2009Q4

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

No problem, as python dev I like this project! 
You should add mod_wsgi to you test instead of mod_python, mod_wsgi is better 
in many 
ways (performances, memory, standardization...). Most of the web applications 
are 
working with it : http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/

Original comment by dory.thi...@gmail.com on 30 Dec 2009 at 7:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

r954 was rolled back in r956: it was breaking the static build on Linux 
(despite working 
on Darwin) just fine. Reopening this issue accordingly.

Original comment by collinw on 1 Jan 2010 at 3:34

Changed state: Started

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Note to self: need to apply http://codereview.appspot.com/181106, too.

Original comment by collinw on 5 Jan 2010 at 12:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Fixed for real in r981.

Original comment by collinw on 9 Jan 2010 at 1:21

Changed state: Fixed