@eardiel @troymcdiarmid - can one of you please change the stats methods (second paragraph of section titled Image acquisition of behavior, Behavioral scoring and statistical analysis) to:
Reversal distances and durations in response to tap were compared across strains by statistical analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) tests. Genotype was modeled as a fixed effect. Petri plate (on which the worms were tested; minimum of 3 Petri plates of ~ 50 worms per experimental condition) was modeled as a random effect nested within the fixed effect. For all statistical tests an alpha value of 0.05 was used to determine significance. All analysis was performed using the statistical software programming language, R, and the following R packages: tidyverse, stringr, nlme, broom and multcomp. Analysis code can be accessed here: https://github.com/ttimbers/CaMK_and_OGT-1_modulate_mechanoresponding_and_learning/tree/master/src
@eardiel @troymcdiarmid - can one of you please change the stats methods (second paragraph of section titled Image acquisition of behavior, Behavioral scoring and statistical analysis) to:
Reversal distances and durations in response to tap were compared across strains by statistical analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) tests. Genotype was modeled as a fixed effect. Petri plate (on which the worms were tested; minimum of 3 Petri plates of ~ 50 worms per experimental condition) was modeled as a random effect nested within the fixed effect. For all statistical tests an alpha value of 0.05 was used to determine significance. All analysis was performed using the statistical software programming language, R, and the following R packages: tidyverse, stringr, nlme, broom and multcomp. Analysis code can be accessed here: https://github.com/ttimbers/CaMK_and_OGT-1_modulate_mechanoresponding_and_learning/tree/master/src