Closed df6dbf closed 5 years ago
I can't reproduce this issue. Just updated from 0.1.1 to 0.2.2 and the response of a filter is the same in both versions.
cannot reproduce, but I tested it with NanoVNASharp. May be this is nanoVNA-saver issue
Have here "strange" Peaks after upgrading to v0.2.1. v0.2.2 shows same behaviour. Took Screenshots with nanoVNA-saver to show the Problem. The v0.2.0 from 27. Sept. seems ok.
are You using multiple segments in nanovna-saver ? I have similar Peaks, but only in nanovna-saver with multiple segments.
Yes, its occured only in Multi-Segment Mode.
This issue is caused by behavior change of sweep
command at 0.2.0.
This commit https://github.com/ttrftech/NanoVNA/commit/3fc17e18f900c6bb31fb1e72bab345adf576c15c shall make equivalent to former behavior. When I tested NanoVNA-saver 0.1.0 in multisegment mode with new firmware, it works well.
New release 0.2.3 is available including commit above. Could you check it out?
Installed the 0.2.3 and tested with actual Version of nanoVNA-saver. It seems the problem is solved. Thank you! :)
Have here "strange" Peaks after upgrading to v0.2.1. v0.2.2 shows same behaviour. Took Screenshots with nanoVNA-saver to show the Problem. The v0.2.0 from 27. Sept. seems ok.
Screenshot from 0.2.0 (27.Sept)
Screenshot from 0.2.2 (29.Sept)