Closed utnapischtim closed 1 year ago
PERF203: yes the performance could be better, but the moving the try except block outside of the loop would change the behaviour in those cases
FA102: is not necessary, we are using only python >=3.9
RUF015: yes next() would be better performance-wise, but it reads strang. if there was a first() it would be selected.
PERF203: yes the performance could be better, but the moving the try except block outside of the loop would change the behaviour in those cases
FA102: is not necessary, we are using only python >=3.9
RUF015: yes next() would be better performance-wise, but it reads strang. if there was a first() it would be selected.