Closed valerdi closed 1 year ago
Hi @valerdi ,
--eval
option.save_flow=True
. Or, you can also save the flow in the main.py after the estimation is done.Thanks for the response. I'm playing around with the code, give me some days before closing this to see if I understand well the function you linked.
Hey, I was trying the --eval option, but got the following error:
2023-10-02 15:05:41,007 - src.feature_calculator - WARNING - Feature calculation is disabled in this source code. 2023-10-02 15:05:41,007 - __main__ - INFO - Sequential optimization Traceback (most recent call last): File "main.py", line 157, in <module> assert loader.gt_flow_available # evaluate with GT flow AssertionError
Is it only possible to run it with ground truth, or is there a way around it?
Kind regards and thank you for your time!
@JulianKrismer Hi. You can run without GT flow (with modifying the main.py.)
Without GT flow and evaluation, actually one does not need to follow the dt=1,4
conventions in MVSEC, and you can run the flow estimation for arbitrary timestamps. What is your usecase? Do you have specific timestamp list that you want to estimate?
Hi @shiba24, regarding my questions, everything is running well, thanks a lot!
How about @JulianKrismer ?
I wasn't able to test it yet, unfortunately. I'm working on a master thesis, and am trying to see if optical flow could help me locate the logo of a spinning ball.
Ok, let me know if I could help you. Feel free to open another issue if necessary. Closing it as the original question is resolved.
Hi there, I've runned
python3 main.py --config_file ./configs/mvsec_indoor_no_timeaware.yaml
without changing the original config you provide.
Seems like it is computing optical flow between ind1 and ind2 but is not iterating through the full dataset. Is there a parameter in yaml config to do it? Also, is there a config to output the actual values of optical flow in a file?
One last question, in the paper the multi-scale approach use the information from previous batch to initialize the values of the different scales in the next batch, is this implemented?
Thanks in advance