individual occurrence record display: change order / label of collector name, collector number, collection date

[GoogleCodeExporter]

We propose to make minor changes in the GBIF-output:

A) change order of "Collector number" (term, see below) & Collector name

B) change term "Collector number" (see below)
Motivation:  Logically the "Collector name" is a header for number and
date. We think this would be more user-friendly.

To identify a specimen, botanists have a kind of "Tiple-ID", i.e.

1) Name of the collector, person who collected the organism in the field
(e.g. Freiberg, Martin)

2) The physical ID-number of the specimen given by the collector. It seems
to us that "Collector number" do not refer to the ID of a collector but to
the ID, given by a collector. This is often called  "collection number" in
specimen-databases, because this term may be interpreted as the
(barcode)-number in a collection (herbarium) we propose "Collector's name".

3) The collecting date (e.g. 30.09.1998, when the specimen was collected in
the field).

State of art (2007-11-27)

Dataset

Data Provider: 
Dataset: 
Institution code: 
Collection code: 
Catalogue No: 
Basis of record: 
Collector number: 98095
Collector name:  Freiberg, Martin
Date collected: 30.09.1998

Proposed (new order, changed term):

Dataset

Data Provider: 
Dataset: 
Institution code: 
Collection code: 
Catalogue No: 
Basis of record: 
Collector name:  Freiberg, Martin
Collector's number: 98095
Date collected: 30.09.1998

(submitted by W.-H.Kusber and E.Zippel)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by josecua...@gmail.com on 31 Jul 2009 at 1:38

[GoogleCodeExporter]

"Collector name" element was moved up a bit. really small change on this bug.

Original comment by josecua...@gmail.com on 16 Aug 2009 at 11:22

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by ah...@gbif.org on 17 Aug 2009 at 9:51

• Changed state: Verified