Open Tanuj253 opened 7 months ago
Team Review "Dante" grading "Tanuj team"
[x] Showing key user interaction and learning(s). For instance how you visualized Algorithms, Data, Data Structures. Or, how you provided response and Feedback to user on their success in learning.
.88/.9 Did user interactions through a variety of buttons.
Per check.
0.55 not attempted/no check
0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime
0.8 mastery and runtime
0.9 above and beyond.
Freeform comment.
Provide positivies and growth summary.
Justify or comment on final score.
Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8.
explain:
Very good
.87/.9 ((.88x3)+(.85x2))/5~.87/.9
Good: all of the tangibles were very good and the commits were all consistent and showed progress.
bad: coould've included more plans throughout their journey to show how they were progressing.
Team Review
Individual Reviews
Team Conclusion/Retrospective:
Site Links:
Original Plan:
Binary Tutorial
Binary Color Game
Forms of Practice and Learning; Other Features Format of website Learn basics → then play a game or interact with another feature to practice that Ex: we could have a binary grid game to practice the basic decimal conversion Hexadecimal basics like the home page tutorial (Binary Tutorial) but with hexadecimal → lets user have knowledge in order to play the Color Game
Accomplishments:
Data Abstractions were used within the 5x5 game especially: It was tough to link the goal values too the outputted values. It took some time to work through and integrate the submit and redo buttons.