Closed sebmooreaz closed 4 years ago
That's correct. In this case pdok is incorrect, because apparently they cast the identificatie
to integers, which removes the 0-padding.
Why have a 0-padded ID? Because the first 4 digits of the ID is the municipality code, which begins below 1000.
For the correct identificatie
attribute please refer to the official BAG viewer: https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl
Thank you for your reply, and thank you for the precise information. I will talk to the pdok community about it because it is quiet disturbing that an id value changes from one dataset source to the other.
I would like to add that 3dbag and other Tudelft projects are really well thought and really interesting. Thank you for that.
Hello,
I saw that the "identificatie": number from the 3DBAG dataset is different from the "identificatie": number of the BAG dataset from Pdok.
It seems like the 3DBAG "identificatie" number always adds a 0 at the start of the number, am I correct?