Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
See also my issue 84.
Original comment by victor.p...@gmail.com
on 25 Jun 2009 at 12:55
Variable "indexColumns" is NULL in "FullText.hasChanged()" method.
Original comment by victor.p...@gmail.com
on 25 Jun 2009 at 12:56
I think that method FullTextLucene.init() is not executed at all. Why?
Original comment by victor.p...@gmail.com
on 25 Jun 2009 at 1:10
Initial error in "org.apache.lucene.index.IndexModifier".
Original comment by victor.p...@gmail.com
on 25 Jun 2009 at 1:27
Corrupted index :(
Original comment by victor.p...@gmail.com
on 25 Jun 2009 at 1:37
Hi,
Could you try out the latest release (1.1.115)? I believe this problem is
fixed. See
also http://www.h2database.com/html/changelog.html
Original comment by thomas.t...@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2009 at 9:38
Version 1.1.115 give the same results.
Original comment by victor.p...@gmail.com
on 29 Jun 2009 at 7:42
It seems that the error appeared due to a Lucene index corruption.
I don't know cause of this corruption but it is not the first time I have seen
it.
So what do you think about idea to store Lucene index directly in the H2
database?
Does it improve the stability of index?
Original comment by victor.p...@gmail.com
on 29 Jun 2009 at 8:17
Hi,
I understand now. Unfortunately H2 throws the 'wrong' exception. It swallows the
Lucene exception, and you only see the NullPointerException. I will change H2
so the
'right' exception is thrown:
Caused by: org.apache.lucene.store.LockObtainFailedException: Lock obtain timed
out:
SimpleFSLock@/Users/tmueller/Desktop/error_db/store/write.lock
at org.apache.lucene.store.Lock.obtain(Lock.java:70)
at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.init(IndexWriter.java:598)
at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.<init>(IndexWriter.java:410)
Original comment by thomas.t...@gmail.com
on 29 Jun 2009 at 7:12
Hi,
> So what do you think about idea to store Lucene index directly in the H2
database?
> Does it improve the stability of index?
I'm not sure if that would really solve the problem. I will add a feature
request for
it, but I'm afraid I will not have time to implement it myself in the near
future.
Original comment by thomas.t...@gmail.com
on 29 Jun 2009 at 7:16
> I will change H2 so the 'right' exception is thrown...
OK. It is very good.
Original comment by victor.p...@gmail.com
on 30 Jun 2009 at 5:34
> I'm not sure if that would really solve the problem. I will add a feature
request
> for it,
OK.
> but I'm afraid I will not have time to implement it myself in the near future.
No wonder. I will try to make some experiments.
Original comment by victor.p...@gmail.com
on 30 Jun 2009 at 5:46
[deleted comment]
If I'm correct, starting from 1.1.114 the fulltext triggers were updated to use
new
FullText.hasChanged() method to detect if changes really happened in indexed
columns:
static boolean hasChanged(Object[] oldRow, Object[] newRow, int[] indexColumns) {
for (int c : indexColumns) {
Object o = oldRow[c], n = newRow[c];
if (!o.equals(n)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
Atleast with my code the .114 and .115 fulltext updates do not work when
updating
previously NULL valued columns to a new value (null or not). At line 692:
if (!o.equals(n)) {
When o is null, the trigger fails with obvious NPE. The new hasChanged method
does
not handle null values correctly.
I have not encountered situation where indexColumns array is null - and causing
NPE.
I hope this can be fixed soon :)
Original comment by ilkka.my...@gmail.com
on 30 Jun 2009 at 2:35
Could this be fixed with following change to FullText.java line 692:
if ( ( o != null && ! o.equals(n) ) || ( o == null && n != null ) ) {
?
Original comment by ilkka.my...@gmail.com
on 30 Jun 2009 at 2:39
Hi,
Thanks a lot! I will change the code to:
if (o == null) {
if (n != null) {
return true;
}
} else if (!o.equals(n)) {
return true;
}
Regards,
Thomas
Original comment by thomas.t...@gmail.com
on 2 Jul 2009 at 8:08
Issue 93 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by thomas.t...@gmail.com
on 2 Jul 2009 at 8:13
This bug is fixed with the latest release (1.1.116).
If there is still a problem, please open a new issue.
Original comment by thomas.t...@gmail.com
on 18 Jul 2009 at 9:53
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
victor.p...@gmail.com
on 25 Jun 2009 at 12:54