Closed PhilippvK closed 1 year ago
Currently we have sort of a naming conflict in the project:
A session may be composed of multiple runs while each run has a set of stages:
At some time we should rename the RUN stage to something less confusing, e.g. execute or evaluate.
execute
evaluate
I like run because it is quite short and easy to write on the cmdline i.e. in mlonmcu flow run but I am open for other suggestions.
run
mlonmcu flow run
Not changing this because it is kinda established now.
Currently we have sort of a naming conflict in the project:
A session may be composed of multiple runs while each run has a set of stages:
At some time we should rename the RUN stage to something less confusing, e.g.
execute
orevaluate
.