Closed ctennis closed 3 years ago
Thanks @ctennis for the pull request! We'll review this tomorrow and let you know if we have any feedback.
@ctennis Hey, while testing and looking for additional scopes, we couldn't seem to find the scope to include for the okta_user_type
table; when we try to query that table using a private key, we receive an error. Just curious, did you run across any scopes for this resource type while searching?
@ctennis Hey, while testing and looking for additional scopes, we couldn't seem to find the scope to include for the
okta_user_type
table; when we try to query that table using a private key, we receive an error. Just curious, did you run across any scopes for this resource type while searching?
You're right, I can't seem to find a scope here either. I'll open a service ticket with Okta, the API for this lives under the /meta hierarchy and I wonder if they just overlooked it.
Confirmed with Okta, this particular API isn't supported via oauth. I upvoted the case regarding it. Not a blocker for us, but I suppose a limitation of this particular table.
Confirmed with Okta, this particular API isn't supported via oauth. I upvoted the case regarding it. Not a blocker for us, but I suppose a limitation of this particular table.
Thank you for checking the details that far.
Thanks again @ctennis for the contribution, appreciate it!
I can confirm this works great, and is a much more secure way of configuring API access into Okta (though is a bit more work to initially setup).