Update travel tracker project to remove OOP related items and match new rubric system

[CassandraGoose]

This PR addressed issue #619

BIG NOTE This PR is basically a copy of #653 . So, I'm not sure there will really need to be much review. The main difference is that Travel Tracker has extensions where Overlook did not. I'd still love a second pair of eyes on this - in case I missed anything

Changes Requested in Issue

• [x] The current project outlines the use of classes to build the project
• [x] The started repo similarly pushes students to build out classes Please see this PR to address this bullet point
• [x] The push to use classes needs to be removed to instead push students to functions
• [ ] Additionally, the project currently demands the use of webpack. This could be replaced with Parcel, a modern alternative build tool that is less configuration heavy. See question in question section below
• [x] Update rubrics to use the Yes, Not Yet, Wow scale that was piloted on M1 projects. Use M1 final projects as a guide for consistency.

Changes Made:

• added webpack to the technologies list
• updated objectives to reflect functional paradigm expectations
• removed redundant timeline and date information
• moved workflow requirements above the iterations because it's more of a planning topic.
• made a note to connect their previously more scaffolded projects in the "Iterations Section" because they won't receive dictated functions to create for this project. (This is how it originally was, it just didn't explain it) See the more scaffolded version here
• updated various sections including collaboration expectations and testing sections to align with this What's Cookin draft
• styled the Rubric section to match up more with the Mod 1 rubric. example
• updated rubric sections to reflect functional paradigm expectations

Motivations

• seems good to have the Mod2 rubrics match the Mod1 rubrics
• need functional style information instead of OOP style information

Questions

• Do we like the style of the rubric (with the little, clickable drop downs?)? I'm happy to change it however.
• Do we want to tell the students what a passing score is? Seems like a nice thing to do, especially since instructors jump around so much. (for example, see this project)
• Does anybody have an opinion on the Parcel vs Webpack discussion? See this thread.
• Does anybody have an opinion on what kinds of files students are expected to use in this project? Right now, the webpack starter kit is set up to let students create the files they want. We aren't dictating it to them... Personally, I like this because they're going to have to be able to make these decisions to be successful in React. See this thread.

Completed #619

[nicktu12]

This looks good to me Cass!