CVE-2021-3807 (High) detected in ansi-regex-4.1.0.tgz, ansi-regex-3.0.0.tgz - autoclosed

[mend-bolt-for-github[bot]]

CVE-2021-3807 - High Severity Vulnerability

Vulnerable Libraries - ansi-regex-4.1.0.tgz, ansi-regex-3.0.0.tgz

ansi-regex-4.1.0.tgz

Regular expression for matching ANSI escape codes

Library home page: https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-regex/-/ansi-regex-4.1.0.tgz

Dependency Hierarchy: - jest-24.8.0.tgz (Root Library) - jest-cli-24.9.0.tgz - core-24.9.0.tgz - strip-ansi-5.2.0.tgz - :x: **ansi-regex-4.1.0.tgz** (Vulnerable Library)

ansi-regex-3.0.0.tgz

Regular expression for matching ANSI escape codes

Library home page: https://registry.npmjs.org/ansi-regex/-/ansi-regex-3.0.0.tgz

Dependency Hierarchy: - @grafana/ui-6.7.0-pre.tgz (Root Library) - react-storybook-addon-props-combinations-1.1.0.tgz - pretty-format-21.2.1.tgz - :x: **ansi-regex-3.0.0.tgz** (Vulnerable Library)

Found in HEAD commit: 3b956fc649fb80f3c2734d2976b6fce921c134b7

Found in base branch: datasource-meta

Vulnerability Details

ansi-regex is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

Publish Date: 2021-09-17

URL: CVE-2021-3807

CVSS 3 Score Details (7.5)

Base Score Metrics: - Exploitability Metrics: - Attack Vector: Network - Attack Complexity: Low - Privileges Required: None - User Interaction: None - Scope: Unchanged - Impact Metrics: - Confidentiality Impact: None - Integrity Impact: None - Availability Impact: High

For more information on CVSS3 Scores, click here.

Suggested Fix

Type: Upgrade version

Origin: https://huntr.dev/bounties/5b3cf33b-ede0-4398-9974-800876dfd994/

Release Date: 2021-09-17

Fix Resolution (ansi-regex): 4.1.1

Direct dependency fix Resolution (jest): 26.0.0-alpha.0

---

Step up your Open Source Security Game with WhiteSource here

[mend-bolt-for-github[bot]]

:information_source: This issue was automatically closed by WhiteSource because it is a duplicate of an existing issue: #637

[mend-bolt-for-github[bot]]

:information_source: This issue was automatically closed by WhiteSource because it is a duplicate of an existing issue: #637