Closed wenyiwangbst closed 2 years ago
@wenyiwangbst Which config file did you use?
Hi, thanks for replying. I'm using /waymo_configs/pd_kf_giou.yaml config file
@wenyiwangbst Please use vc_kf_giou
for vehicles/cyclists and pd_kf_giou
for pedestrians. I tested this repo on my side before open sourcing. If you still cannot re-produce, I will get back after eccv deadline.
Tried the code on NuScenes, the result on evaluation set is AMOTA0.549. Also would it be possible to get your centerpoint inference result on Waymo? it took me a while to generate the inference result on NuScenes, and downloading the Waymo dataset is going to take a while. Thanks
Hi, thank you for sharing your code. I have test run the code on the full waymo validation dataset and using the detection you send to me(thanks for doing that) and use waymo evaluation metrics to do the evaluation. The result I got shows as following: But in the paper the L2 Vehicle could achieve around 0.56 in MOTA which is about 3.5% higher than my implement. Can I ask if the released code is of the same setting in parameter as the one in the paper and what evaluation method are you guys using. Thanks again for all your work and help.
hi wenyi, any chance you can pass along that waymo inference file to me? my email is blp_engineer@outlook.com Thanks.
@BaiLiping @wenyiwangbst I just added the generated results at README. Please check out the dropbox links and see if they are helpful.
Thanks a lot.
Hi, thank you for sharing your code. I have test run the code on the full waymo validation dataset and using the detection you send to me(thanks for doing that) and use waymo evaluation metrics to do the evaluation. The result I got shows as following: But in the paper the L2 Vehicle could achieve around 0.56 in MOTA which is about 3.5% higher than my implement. Can I ask if the released code is of the same setting in parameter as the one in the paper and what evaluation method are you guys using. Thanks again for all your work and help.