search

tutulino / Megaminer

Multipool and multialgo windows miner
GNU General Public License v3.0
78 stars 69 forks source link

KECCAK on ZergPool: profit too high? #332

Closed eMTee72 closed 6 years ago

eMTee72 commented 6 years ago

Just to be sure: is MM keeping in mind that KECCAK is in mBTC/GH/day? Quote (from ZergPool website): values in mBTC/Mh/day (mBTC/GH/day for sha256, keccakc, scrypt, qubit, blake, x11 algos, Kh for yescrypt, kS for equihash)

It seems the estimates for KECCAK 5MaxCoin) is a bit on the high end as of today / yesterday...

tutulino commented 6 years ago

keccakc and keccak are different algos....

Kekkakc is considered as mBTC but keccak not.

eMTee72 commented 6 years ago

If different algo's: N-CcminerTpruvot.json mentions

Algorithms": [ {"skunk":"-a skunk"}, {"jha":"-a jha"}, {"Tribus":"-a tribus"}, {"lyra2z" : "-a lyra2z" }, {"lyra2v2" : "-a lyra2v2" }, {"whirpool":"-a whirl"}, {"phi":"-a phi"}, {"polytimos": "-a polytimos"}, {"keccakc":"-a keccakc"}, {"keccak":"-a keccakc"} ]

So that last line is then not correct?

tutulino commented 6 years ago

true, it´s not correct, must be

{"keccak":"-a keccak"}