Closed allegroCoder closed 8 years ago
Thanks @allegroCoder! A couple of questions:
Why do we have two separate Intel 8051 subtables?
That's a good point! There is an overlapping between some of the graphs present in Intel-8051
and Asynch-8051
. What about creating two folders inside Intel-8051
named: subset-1
and subset-2
?
@Edit: Maybe a better idea would be simply concatenating the two subsets. All the previous Intel graphs, along with the ones I have just done (starting from the file composed by 10 graphs). Yes, I will probably do that. Let me know your thoughts about this.
Or maybe, do you want me to mix all the graphs together in the same folder?
You have seconds in brackets, but I think we put opcode length in brackets.
Sorry, that was misleading. The numbers I inserted between the brackets represent the number of solutions tried in scenco
. Is it ok for you if I recompute all of the solutions for heuristic encoding for all of the graphs, setting the number of solutions to 10? In such a way to have more consistent results in terms of run-time?
Now, It should be ready to be merged in my opinion. @snowleopard : Please, have a look at the tables and at the repository tree to be sure.
I have:
heuristic encoding
, computing the final result using 10 solutions.README
file:+1:
Benchmarks for Asynch-8051(Top-level control) processor:
[5,10..35] : 37
graphs.