Closed malcolmsharpe closed 5 years ago
This input:
Board level 1 health 30 * Amalgam Vs level 2 health 30 * Amalgam * Amalgam
Produces:
-------------------------------- win: 0%, tie: 0%, lose: 100% mean score: -1, median score: -1 percentiles: -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 mean damage taken: 3 expected health afterwards: 27, 0% chance to die mean damage dealt: 2 expected enemy health afterwards: 28, 0% chance they die --------------------------------
I would expect:
-------------------------------- win: 0%, tie: 0%, lose: 100% mean score: -1, median score: -1 percentiles: -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 mean damage taken: 3 expected health afterwards: 27, 0% chance to die mean damage dealt: 0 expected enemy health afterwards: 30, 0% chance they die --------------------------------
As a reverse, consider:
Board level 1 health 30 * Amalgam * Amalgam Vs level 2 health 30 * Amalgam
This produces:
-------------------------------- win: 100%, tie: 0%, lose: 0% mean score: 1, median score: 1 percentiles: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mean damage taken: 0 expected health afterwards: 30, 0% chance to die mean damage dealt: 0 expected enemy health afterwards: 30, 0% chance they die --------------------------------
-------------------------------- win: 100%, tie: 0%, lose: 0% mean score: 1, median score: 1 percentiles: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mean damage taken: 0 expected health afterwards: 30, 0% chance to die mean damage dealt: 2 expected enemy health afterwards: 28, 0% chance they die --------------------------------
I guess that the "damage dealt" calculation is incorrectly using your opponent's final board instead of your own.
You are right, the damage dealt calculation was using the the wrong side of the board half the time. It is now fixed (I'll upload a fixed compiled version later today)
This input:
Produces:
I would expect:
As a reverse, consider:
This produces:
I would expect:
I guess that the "damage dealt" calculation is incorrectly using your opponent's final board instead of your own.